Wednesday, November 18, 2015
MRS ANANDHEE SASITHARAN INTRO: The violation of the human rights of the Tamil people in the North and East of Sri Lanka continues on a daily basis without any respite for the victims. One of the people with a first hand experience of this oppression and suppresion is Mrs Anandhee Sasitharan, 45, of Jaffna. Mrs Sasitharan's husband, Mr Ezhilanaru Sasitharan, is still missing after surrendering to the Sri Lankan army in 2009. One of her younger brothers, aged 19, also went missing in 2003 and a sister, who was politically active, was killed. She was one of the delegates who attended the two-day conference on peace and justice for Sri Lankan Tamils in Durban on November 6 and 7. The conference was organised by the South African-based Solidarity Group for Peace and Justice(SGPJ) with the full blessing of the South African Government. More than 30 stakeholders, representing a number of organisations in Sri Lanka and the Diaspora, attended the conference. I interviewed Mrs Sasitharan after she gave an emotional speech at the conference about her situation and thousands of others whose husbands and other family members had gone missing after surrendering to the Sri Lankan army at the end of the war in 2009. This report by Subry Govender in South Africa...... .
Monday, November 9, 2015
THE LIFE OF ENSLAVEMENT IN SRI LANKA SEEN THROUGH THE EYES OF A TAMIL VICTIM AND HER FAMILY
(MRS ANANDHEE SASITHARAN)
ARMY CONTROLS THEIR LIVES IN THE NORTH
The violation of the human rights of the Tamil people in the North and East of Sri Lanka continues on a daily basis without any respite for the victims.
One of the people with a first hand experience of this oppression and suppresion is Mrs Anandhee Sasitharan, 45, of Jaffna.
Mrs Sasitharan's husband, Mr Ezhilanaru Sasitharan, is still missing after surrendering to the Sri Lankan army in 2009. One of her younger brothers, aged 19, also went missing in 2003 and a sister, who was politically active, was killed.
She was one of the delegates who attended the two-day conference on peace and justice for Sri Lankan Tamils in Durban on November 6 and 7. The conference was organised by the South African-based Solidarity Group for Peace and Justice(SGPJ) with the full blessing of the South African Government.
More than 30 stakeholders, representing a number of organisations in Sri Lanka and the Diaspora, attended the conference.
I interviewed Mrs Sasitharan after she gave an emotional speech at the conference about her situation and thousands of others whose husbands and other family members had gone missing after surrendering to the Sri Lankan army at the end of the war in 2009.
(Mrs Sasitharan with Dr Paul Newman who helped with the translation from Tamil to English)
Mrs Sasitharan, who is the mother of three young daughters aged 12, 14 and 16, spoke to me in the Tamil language. Another delegate and passionate supporter of the Tamil cause, Dr Paul Newman, from the University of Bangalore in India, helped me with the translation.
During the course of the interview she appeared to be strong and confident despite the emotions of not knowing the whereabouts or fate of her husband over the past six years.
<b>
(Mrs Anandhee Sasitharan meeting former UN Human Rights Commissioner, Ms Navi Pillay, at the conference in Durban)
She was dressed as a traditional Tamil married women in a sari, with a red dot on her forehead and a Thali around her neck.
She told me she has been struggling to secure the release of her husband ever since he surrendered to the Sri Lankan army on May 18 2009 after the war ended with the defeat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam(LTTE).
"After the Sri Lankan army made an announcement that the war had ended and all those who had a connection to the LTTE must surrender on the promise that all of them would be given general amnesty, my husband, my three daughters and I went to the army base and surrendered," she said.
She added: "After a few days, my children and I were released but my husband was taken to an unknown destination along with thousands of others.
"What is sad is that he was unarmed when he surrendered. He was not a fighter during the last stages of the war. He was a political organiser.
"For a very long time their whereabouts were not known. Later the Mahinda Rajapakse Government announced that their whereabouts would be made known to the families and the outside world.
"But so far the struggle has been to get information about their whereabouts. It's now six years since the war has been over."
HUSBAND WAS A LTTE POLITICAL OFFICIAL WHEN THEY MARRIED
Mrs Sasitharan said she fell in love and married her husband with the full knowledge that he was involved with the LTTE as a political officials.
"It was a love marriage," she said. "He was already in the LTTE and I knew that as a fighter anything could happen to him. But despite this, I got married and I have three young daughters.
"I have been fighting to know where he was detained because he was an innocent man who did not harm others."
FORMED A GROUP TO CAMPAIGN FOR THE RELEASE OF THEIR HUSBANDS AND OTHERS
Mrs Sasitharan and other affected families had formed an organised group to make representations to all sectors of government and the outside world in order to highlight the violation of their human rights.
"We have been making representations right from the village authorities, to the district authorities, to the Minister of Justice, Minister of Prisons and even the President about the whereabouts of my husband and the other detained people.
"I even took up the issue with the United Nations and other international organisations. After I did this, the Rajapakse Government said that they had unknown detention centres and they would announce soon as to how many people are being held in the detention centres.
"This was under the previous regime, but after the elections, this new regime of Ranil Wickramsinge has gone back on what Mahinda Rajapakse himself had promised. This government says there are no unknown detention centres and there are no one held in detention centres. This government says there are no one held as political prisoners.
HOPE THAT ONE DAY HE WILL RETURN HOME
"In that context I have spoken very strongly and openly at the UNHRC in 2014 and in 2015. But there has been no way of locating my husband and other people.
"If the Sri Lankan Government continues with this stance, then the only way out is to continue to knock the conscience of the international community and keep knocking at the doors of the UN.
"The struggle continues and I will continue to fight with the hope that one day or other he will return."
SRI LANKAN GOVERNMENT HAS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED THAT IT HAS COMMITTED GENOCIDE AGAINST THE TAMILS
The Tamils in the North and East, according to Mrs Sasitharan, are being subjugated and oppressed because the Sri Lankan Government had not yet acknowledged that it had been responsible for the genocide of Tamils.
The Government had different policies for different sections of the people.
"It has a separate policy for the people of North, a separate policy for the people of the East, separate policy for the people of the South, and also for the people of the West. So they don't have a uniform policy for everybody."
TAMIL NATIONAL ALLIANCE (TNA)
While continuing with her struggles to find out the whereabouts of her husband and other missing people, Mrs Sasitharan said in 2013 she joined the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and contested the elections.
She has been a member of the North Provincial Council since 2013 and has used her new position to highlight the fate of her husband and the others who had surrendered to the army in 2009.
But, despite her new position, she has been regularly informed that the army has no record of her husband and the others.
LIVING IN ENSLAVEMENT
When asked what were the conditions now at the ground-level in the North, she said they were all in an environment of enslavement because more than 150 000 soldiers were stationed in the North. This translated to one soldier for every five Tamils living in the Northern region.
"In this context", she said, "the problems we face are enormous".
(MRS SASITHARAN WITH DELEGATES AT THE END OF THE CONFERENCE IN DURBAN)
YOUNG WIDOWS TARGETED AS AS SEXUAL SLAVES BY THE ARMY
"It cannot be explained in simple words. One example is the case of young widows, who have now become heads of families. Such women are particularly targeted by the soldiers seeking sexual favours. The harrassment of such women is unbearable.
"Under such circumstances we are unable to do any normal work, we are unable to live normally. Around the world, the army is there to protect the people, where as here instead of protecting the people they are further looting the people and further harrassing the people, which is unbearable.
"Even when the United Nations has sent in its investigators and other human rights organisations arrived to investigate the aftermath of the 2009 war, the people are unable to come out and speak openly because of the army. The armed forces are part of the day to day lives, whatever we do we have to report to the armed forces. Without their consent we cannot do anything. It's a life of enslavement that we are leading."
FAMILY'S JEWELLERY STOLEN BY SRI LANKAN WOMEN SOLDIERS
Mrs Sasitharan said their struggles to survive reflected the lives of the Tamil people in general. She and her family were displaced in 1990 when the army confiscated 67 000 acres of their land in the village of Kankesathu. They were forced to move to Jaffna and live in a rented home.
"I come from a family where we had lots of money, lots of jewellery and land," she said.
"We had deposited this jewellery and money in the Eelam Bank but at the end of war, we lost everything. Nobody knows where the money is.
"Our jewellery was stolen by the women soldiers, they took everything, including the gold jewellery. They even took away the gold jewellery that my daughters wore.
"So since then I had to start from scratch. I had a job and I was able to sustain the family but still we are unable to lead a good, decent life.
"But after I contested the elections and won, I now get a salary paid by the NPC, which is not enough to lead a decent life. So it is a day to day struggle but I still believe that one day or the other I will be able to sustain myself and my family with better economic opportunity. But as of now it is an hand-to-mouth existence that I have to live."
SOCIAL SERVICES "ONLY EXIST" - ARMY RUNS EVERYTHING
Asked about the social services, such as schools and hospitals for the people, she said these services were available "but I would say they only exist".
"They are not fully functional and the level of quality that was there during the time of the LTTE is not be seen. When we were in the LTTE-controlled areas everything was excellent. The quality of education, the way the banks operated, industries were there, and level of medical services were of a high standard.
"But now everything happens under the surveillance of the army. The army runs their own farms, cattle sheds, they manage their own agriculture and they interfere in our day-to-day lives.
"Apart from that, there is no normal life, especially for youngsters. After 6pm every body have to shut down and be inside their homes. It's a life of existence, not a full and normal one that people aspire for.
"It's an abnormality which we are forced to live."
WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND DEVELOPMENT
When I asked Mrs Sasitharan how she was coping with all the human rights violations taking place around her, she said she was brought up in a family that promoted womens' rights, development and independence.
"Even after I got married I continued to fight for the rights of women and the liberation of women. I am now trying to bring up my daughters in the same way. I've been teaching them about women's liberation and how important it is for women to speak up for their rights.
"I always encourage them to be different from others. I don't want them to become only doctors and engineers but I want them to pursue careers that will be beneficial to society in general. The eldest daughter is interested in journalism and I believe that this will be good for her and the people. The second one is more interested in law so that she could fight for the rights of others. The third one is more interested in music and dance. So I have given them the liberty to choose their own professions.
"I think they will really do good when they grow up."
TAMIL NADU IS DOING A LOT
Mrs Sasitharan is of the view that India could do much more to alleviate their plight because they consider Tamil Nadu as their "motherland".
She said: "I have always considered Tamil Nadu as our motherland and I believe that the people of Tamil Nadu want to see us free and they are doing a lot for us. They have been fighting for our cause. Ultimately one day or the other, the pressures by Tamil Nadu on the Central Government in New Delhi will bring about a change - if not today but tomorrow it will certainly happen.
"We believe that something can be done through India. In Sri Lanka itself there is hope that we will one day or the other get what is due to us. Till that time I will continue to fight for the cause. I always believe in hope."
The plight of Mrs Sasitharan and her family reflects in a major way the life of tens of thousands of people who have suffered gross human rights violations in the North and East at the hands of the Sri Lankan army and the government in Colombo.
The question that boggles the mind is how long can more can the international community, especially India, turn a blind eye to the suffering of the Tamil masses? ends - Subry Govender/Nov 8 2015
Sunday, November 8, 2015
SRI LANKAN TAMIL STAKEHOLDERS FROM THE NORTH AND EAST OF THE ISLAND AND DIASPORA MEET IN DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA
(FORMER UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, MS NAVI PILLAY, ADDRESSING DELEGATES AT THE CONFERENCE)
(SOUTH AFRICA'S HIGH COMMISSIONER TO SRI LANKA, MR GEOFF DOIDGE, ADDRESSING THE DELEGATES. SEATED NEXT TO HIM IS MR ANIL SOOKLALL, DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CONFERENCE WAS MR KRISH GOVENDER, A FORMER POLITICAL ACTIVIST.)
TAMILS HAVE CLEAR MESSAGE:
WITHDRAW SOLDIERS AND STOP THE COLONISATION OF THE TAMIL HOMELANDS IN THE NORTH AND EAST OF SRI LANKA IN ORDER TO CREATE A CONDUCIVE CLIMATE FOR 'TALKS AND ABOUT TALKS"
By Subry Govender
The oppressed and subjugated Tamil people of Sri Lanka have called on the international community, including the South African Government, to engage the Sri Lankan Government in creating a conducive environment for initial "talks about talks" and ultimately for freedom, self-determination, liberation and peace in their traditional homelands in the North and East of the island country.
This is one of the main features adopted in a declaration by stakeholders from inside the Tamil homelands and the Diasppora at the end of a two-day conference in the South African city of Durban held on November 6 and 7.
SOLIDARITY GROUP FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE
The conference was organised by the Solidarity Group for Peace and Justice in Sri Lanka (SGPJ) with the full support of the South African Government.
The delegates included members of political parties represented in the North Provincial Council; Tamil Civil Society Forum; Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE); British Tamil Forum(BTF);
International Council of Eelam Tamils (15 Countries) (ICET); Thamizhaga Vazhvurimai Katchi (TVK); World Thamil Organization (WTO); and the United States Tamil Political Action Council (USTPAC).
DMK
The conference also received the support of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Naam Thamizhar Katchi in Tamil Nadu; and the
International Movement for Tamil Culture (Africa – South Africa).
The South African High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, Mr Geoff Doidge, and senior officials of the South African Department of International Relations also attended the conference.
(SOME OF THE DELEGATES, INCLUDING MR VEL MURGAN FROM TAMIL NADU, WITH MRS NAVI PILLAY)
MS NAVI PILLAY
The former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Ms Navi Pillay, also attended, addressed and inter-acted with the delegates.
The delegates, in the "Durban Declaration", noted that they were inspired by the struggles of the ruling ANC in South Africa for freedom and the ANC's solid support for the Tamil people's struggles for freedom and liberation.
The delegates emphasised that a number of initial steps must be taken for permanent peace and justice to be realised. These include:
* The withdrawal of soldiers from the North and East. Currently the delegates said there were about 150 000 soldiers deployed in the North - one soldier for every five people, and
* The immediate suspension of the colonisation and Sinhalisation of the Tamil land in the North and East. The delegates called for the return of the land to the people.
The main points reflected in the "Durban Declaration" are:
(DELEGATES AT THE CONFERENCE IN DURBAN)
VICTIM CONSULATATION PROCESS
"The Government of Sri Lanka, which co-sponsored the UNHRC Resolution UN HRC/30/L/29 dated the 01 October 2015 on accountability and reconciliation in Sri Lanka, has been sending out conflicting messages about their obligations under the resolution. Key members of government are downplaying the need for international participation in the accountability process and more particularly the setting up of a criminal justice mechanism as part of the transitional justice process.
"The Sri Lankan Government should clearly outline the aims and objectives of the transitional justice process prior to the commencement of a credible victim consultation process.
SYSTEM CRIMES AGAINST TAMILS
"Successive Governments of Sri Lanka (including the incumbent) have been in denial of the systemic and structural nature of the crimes committed against the Tamils. The war and the systemic crimes perpetrated against the Tamil Nation were aimed at defeating its political demand for self-determination.
(DELEGATES AT THE CONFERENCE IN DURBAN)
THERE MUST BE PUBLIC ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
"The public acknowledgement of systemic crimes committed with impunity against Tamils will be an important first step towards meaningful justice and lasting peace. The Sri Lankan Government should acknowledge resolutions passed by the Northern Provincial Council, the Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu and other democratic institutions and governments that reflect the shared experiences of the Tamil people over the years.
DE-MILITARISATION IS A PRE-CONDITION FOR ESTABLISHING A SAFE AND CONDUCIVE ENVIRONMENT
"We are disappointed that the new Government continues to be in denial about the ongoing problem of militarisation of the North-East of Sri Lanka, including the occupation by armed forces of the Tamil homeland.
"Militarisation impedes the return to normalcy, including the return of and safe access to land, restoration of livelihood for the Tamil people and is one of the primary reasons for ongoing sexual violence, harassment and exploitation of Tamil women and girls.
"Hence, de-militarisation of the North-East is an important pre-condition for establishing a safe and conducive environment for,
the victims and witnesses to take part in a victim consultation process.
an informed, participatory and inclusive dialogue for a constitutional settlement to the National Question.
(DELEGATES AT THE CONFERENCE IN DURBAN)
DE-PROSCRIPTION OF ALL INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANISATIONS
"The continued proscription of the Tamil Diaspora by the Government of Sri Lanka is a serious obstacle towards the participation of members of the Diaspora community in engaging with their brethren in the homeland to collectively work towards justice, peace, reconstruction and socio-economic development. The Tamil Diaspora is a constituent element of the Tamil Nation. The de-legitimisation of a section of the Tamil community will obstruct an open and transparent process towards peace, justice and resolution of the National Question. The Sri Lankan Government must de-proscribe all Diaspora groups and individuals. Real political will and commitment has to be demonstrated to permit Diaspora engagement in the affairs of the North-East.
REPEAL TERRORISM ACT
"To create the necessary environment for exploring peace and justice in Sri Lanka the Government of Sri Lanka should also forthwith repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the 6th amendment to the Sri Lankan constitution, release a comprehensive list of detainees, release all political prisoners, disclose and close all secret camps and abandon the rehabilitation programme for ex-LTTE cadres.
TORTURE, 'WHITE VAN' ABDUCTIONS, AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE MUST END
(MRS SALLY PADAYCHIE, WIFE OF THE LATE SOUTH AFRICAN CABINET MINISTER ROY PADAYCHIE, WITH MRS NAVI PILLAY AND SOME DELEGATES)
"The Government should publicly acknowledge and act upon incidents of torture, intimidation, harassment, sexual violence and ‘white van’ abductions that continues to take place under the present Government, as documented in the OISL report and reported by international human rights groups, NGOs and Tamil civil society organisations in the North-East. The Government should also allow open and unimpeded access for international NGOs and human rights organisations to the North-East to continuously operate and monitor the state of human rights and human security. "
OPPRESSION AND SUBJUGATION MUST END IMMEDIATELY
The Tamils in the North and East of the island have come under severe and sustained oppression after the end of the civil war in 2009 when the Sri Lankan regime and its soldiers are reported to have massacred between 40 000 and 140 000 people.
The Tamils believe that until the perpetrators of the genocide are brought to justice by an international tribunal or the International Court of Justice there could be no permanent peace.
Currently, the international community through the UN has given the Sri Lankan Government a chance to undertake an investigation through the involvement of international judges and other role players.
The Tamils also believe that they should be given an opportunity through a referendum with international involvement to decide what kind of final political solution they would like to see in their traditional homelands.
(THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CONFERENCE, MR KRISH GOVENDER, LISTENING TO DELEGATES. MR GOVENDER IS A FORMER ANTI-APARTHEID ACTIVIST WHO STRUGGLED FOR FREEDOM ALONG WITH OTHER COMRADES)
INDIA, US, UK AND OTHER COUNTRIES
But whether the Singhala majority Sri Lankan Government is prepared to allow the Tamils to have their say is another question altogether.
It's, therefore, vital that countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, India, South Africa, European Union, China, Japan, and Russia, not only fully support the just struggles of the Tamils for freedom, but also persuade the Sri Lankan Government to create the conducive environment for permanent peace and justice for the Tamils.
They have suffered genocides, subjugation and denial of human rights, fredom and self-determination for far too long since the British granted independence to the island of Ceylon more than 60 years ago.
The Tamils of Sri Lanka need to enjoy peace, freedom, and self-determination like all other nations in the world. - ends / Subry Govender
Monday, October 19, 2015
MEDIA STRUGGLES TO BRING ABOUT A FREE AND DEMOCRATIC SOUTH AFRICA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCTOBER 19 1977
On October 19 2015, South Africans once again reflected on the state of the media in the new democratic South Africa by observing the 41st anniversary of the crack down on the media by the former apartheid regime on October 19, 1977. Marimuthu Subramoney, aka Subry Govender, recalls the struggles of the journalists during the 1970s, 1980s, and early 1990s and warns that South Africans must guard against the new elite trying to smother the media through new measures in the name of the new and free South Africa.... .
OCTOBER 19 AND THE STRUGGLES OF JOURNALISTS IN THE 1970S, 1980S AND 1990s
(Veteran struggle journalists who gathered at the home of the late Zwelike in 2012)
One of our formidable struggle journalists during the 1970s and 1980s, Zwelakhe Sisulu, who died at the age of 61 on October 4 2012, was duly acknowledged for playing a crucial role in the struggles to bring about the new non-racial, free and democratic South Africa.
In this article, I want to go back to the days when Zwelakhe and a large number of journalists put their lives on the line to contribute to the liberation struggles.
Before I go into the meat of the topic, I want to submit that the suppression of the media during the apartheid era did not start when the white baaskap National Party came to political power in 1948. But it had its roots when the first newspapers were started by the colonial authorities in the early 1800s.
However, I am not going to go back in history but deal primarily with the period when the National Party introduced all kinds of laws to suppress, oppress, harrass and intimidate journalists - especially journalists of colour.
Being white, colonial and racial driven - the media during this period was mainly concerned with maintaining and retaining white domination of the social, economic and political fabric of South Africa.
MEDIA - COLONIAL MENTALITY
The whites owned, controlled, managed and edited nearly all the newspapers - with the exception of one or two minor and insignificant publications - and the National Party monopolised the airwaves in the name of the South African Broadcasting Corporation(SABC).
The National Party, which F W De Klerk unashamedly tried to sell to the people of Indian origin, coloured people and Africans in the early 1990s, had in their arsenal more than 100 statutes that limited the freedom of the Press. The repressive atmosphere really began after the Sharpeville uprisings on March 21 1960 when police shot dead peaceful marchers who were protesting against the carrying of the hateful Dom-Pass.
The National Party Government introduced a state of emergency and banned the ANC and the PAC and crushed all opposition to white minority rule.
Publications such as the New Age, Fighting Talk, Advance and Guardian were forced to close shop and the journalists working in these and other progressive newspapers either had to flee the country or go underground.
During this period of repression, some of the only black-oriented newspapers that were allowed to operate were the Drum magazine and the Golden City Post. Although they reported on some political developments, they were, however, no danger to the existence of the white state.
Being white-owned and managed, these newspapers concentrated on the sensational - sex, crime and gangs and sport - in order to survive. There were some journalists during this period in the 1980s who dared to question the white status quo - but they too were quickly intimidated and forced to flee the country or tone down.
(Journalists protesting against the banning of the UBJ and other organisations)
BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS
In the early 1970s - when the black consciousness movement took root after the establishment of the South African Students Organisation(SAS0) - a number of black journalists came to the fore - prepared to take on the white oppressors irrespective of the consquences. These journalists were primarily working at that time for newspapers such as the World and Weekend World, and socially-conscious journalists working for mainstream newspapers such as the former Rand Daily Mail, the East London Daily Dispatch, the Cape Times and Argus, the Johannesburg Star and the Durban Daily News.
They tried to introduce a new and dynamic approach to journalism by tackling the social, economic, sporting and political oppression of the black majority. The struggle for freedom of the Press and the liberty of the people had just started in ernest once again.
FRELIMO RALLY
But no sooner had black journalists - with a black consciousness background - began to tackle real and fundamental issues affecting the majority - the System struck back with vengeance in 1974 when the Frelimo rally was scheduled to be held at Durban's Currie's Fountain. The apartheid regime banned the rally and prohibited newspapers from publishing any news item that would amount to publicising the event.
This correspondent was at this time with the Daily News and assigned to cover the rally. This correspondent was not only detained and interrogated but my editor, Mr John O'Mally, was charged for publicising the event.
Another colleague, Joan Dobson, skipped the country and fled into exile because the apartheid regime suspected she was in league with the organisers of the rally. After the dawn of our new demcoracy in April 1994, she began reporting from Harare for the SABC's AM and PM live programmes at that time.
ROBBEN ISLAND
(The Daily News in Durban carrying a front page lead story about the banning of Zwelike Sisulu and Marimuthu Subramoney in December 1980)
As a matter of interest, black consciousness leaders like the late Strini Moodley, Saths Cooper, Aubrey Mokoape and others were charged under the infamous Terrorism Act and as a result of the rally were convicted and sentenced to Robben Island.
Further onslaughts against the media began after the 1976 Soweto uprisings when school children protested against the imposition of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction in their schools.
Two months after the Soweto uprisings nine black journalists, who played a leading role in reporting events in Soweto, were detained under the regime's Internal Security Act, and two others were incarcerated under Section 6 of the Terrorism Act.
TERRORISM ACT
Among the very first to be arrested was Joe Thloloe, who was at that time working for the World Newspaper; Peter Magubane, South Africa's world-famous photo-journalist who worked at that time for the Rand Daily Mail and Miss Thenjiwe Mntintso, who worked at the Daily Dispatch in East London at that time.
(JOE THLOLOE, ONE OF THE DOYENS WHO WAS PERSECUTED, BANNED, JAILED, DETAINED AND HOUSE ARRESTED DURING THE DARKS DAYS OF APARTHEID)
UNION OF BLACK JOURNALISTS
The majority of them were held for about four months without being tried in a court of law. They were released at the end of December 1976 but some were re-arrested in 1977. Joe Thloloe was one of those re-arrested and he was held incommunicado for 547 days under Section of the Terrorism Act.
The others were Willie Bokala, a reporter for the banned World newspaper who was held in detention for more than a year; Jan Tugwana, a reporter for the then Rand Daily Mail who was also held in detention for more than a year under Section 6 of the Terrorism Act; Ms Juby Mayet, a doyen of black journalists who was held incommunicado under the Internal Security Act at the Fort Prison in Johannesburg; Isaac Moroe, the first president of the Writers Association of SA (WASA) in Bloemfontein; and Bularo Diphoto, a free-lance journalist in the town of Kroonstad who was also detained under Section 6 of the Terrorism Act.
Another journalist, Mr Moffat Zungu, who was a reporter for the World Newspaper, was an accused in the Pan African Congress (PAC) trial that took place in Bethal, near Johannesburg. He was first detained under Section 6 of the Terrorism Act.
The blackest day in the history of Press Freedom in so far as the black majority was concerned took place on October 19 1977 when the notorious Jimmy Kruger banned the only two newspapers respected among black people - the World and Weekend World.
Mr Kruger, who became infamous for describing Steve Biko's death two months earlier as - "It leaves me cold" - at the same time banned the Union of Black Journalists(UBJ) and 17 other organisations; the publication of the UBJ - AZIZTHULA; religious and student publications; locked up the editor and news editor of the World and Weekend World - the late Percy Qoboza and the late Aggrey Klaaste respectively; and banned for five years the Editor of the Daily Dispacth, the late Donald Woods.
The regime also confiscated all our stationery and equipment and seized our funds.
Six other journalists were also detained at this time - including Thenjiwe Mntintso, a former ambassador now based at the ANC headquarters in Johannesburg; and Enoch Duma - who worked for the Star newspaper at that time. He fled into exile after being released after more than two years in detention. He returned to the country recently and is currently writing his autobiography and also involved in the academic field.
Almost every member of the UBJ was visited by the security police all over the country; their homes and offices raided and searched and interrogated. All the raids were carried out at the unearthly hours of 4am and 5am in the morning. I remember my mother knocking my door and saying in our Tamil mother tongue: "Some white people are here asking for you."
My rooms were searched and all literature relating to the UBJ were confiscated. They even confiscated a letter I had written to the late Prime Minister of India, Mrs Indira Gandhi. I don't know whether that letter reached Mrs Gandhi because India at that time was leading the international struggle against minority rule in South Africa.
After completing their raid, they took me to the Daily News in Field Street in Durban where they searched my desk.
When representations were made to Mr Kruger for the release of the detained journalists, he had the temerity to announce that the detentions were not meant to intimidate the Press and that his Government had good reasons to detain the journalists.
It was during this traumatic period that another publication of the UBJ, UBJ Bulletin, and all subsequent editions were banned. The UBJ Bulletin contained some revealing articles about the activities of the South African Police during the Soweto uprisings. Four UBJ officials - Juby Mayet, Joe Thloloe, Mike Nkadimeng and the late Mike Norton - were charged for producing an undesirable publication.
Inspite of world-wide condemnation of the banning, detention and harrassment of journalists, the state security police continued with their jack-boot tactics.
In Durban two Daily News journalists - Wiseman Khuzwayo and Quarish Patel - were detained without trial for more than three months.
( OFFICIALS AND MEMBERS OF THE UBJ DURING A MEETING AT THE WENTWORTH HOTEL IN THE LATE 1970S)
PROTESTS
MONA BADELA
On November 30 1977, the day white South Africa went to the polls to give John Vorster another mandate to continue to oppress the black majority, 29 black journalists, including the late Zwelakhe Sisulu and Ms Juby Mayet, staged a march in the centre of Johannesburg against the banning of the UBJ and the detention of journalists. They were detained for the night at the notorious John Vorster Police station and charged under the Riotous Assemblies Act and fined R50 each.
Some of our colleagues who found it impossible to continue to work in South Africa skipped the country under trying circumstances. They included Duma Ndhlovu, Nat Serache, Boy Matthews Nonyang and Wiseman Khuzwayo.
Those who remained - including Juby Mayet, Zwelakhe Sisulu, Mona Badela of Port Elizabeth, Philip Mthimkulu, Joe Thloloe, Charles Nqakula, Rashid Seria, this correspondent and many others - vowed to continue the struggle. We committed ourselves in the belief that there could be no Press freedom in South Africa as long as the society in which we lived was not free. But the regime was also determined to make life difficult for us.
In July 1978 when we scheduled to hold a gathering of former UBJ members in Port Elizabeth to chart our future course of action - the regime banned our gathering and prohibited us from travelling to the Easten Cape city. But being determined to take on the regime head-on, we quickly re-scheduled our meeting to be held in the town of Verulam, about 25km north of Durban. Unknown to us, the dreaded Security Police tapped our telephone conversations and had the Starlite Hotel in Verulam bugged. The Security Police were listening to the entire proceedings of our meeting and immediately decided that we were a bunch of "media terriorists" who should be taken out of society.
NEW APPROACH
At our meeting we decided to establish our own daily and weekly newspapers and a news agency because we were of the firm belief that the establishment media was not catering for the black majority. The white establishment media of that era, as you have already been informed, was aimed at protecting and promoting the privileges of the white minority.
But sadly we did not have the resources to embark on such ambitious projects. Nevertheless many of us who became frustrated with the establishment media began to make arrangements for the establishment of regional newspapers that would provide an alternative voice to the establishment media and the National Party-controlled SABC.
When the regime leaders realised that black journalists were not prepared to cow down and submit to their dictates, they intensfied their harrassment. In June 1980 when school children all over the country bocyotted classes against the unequal and inferior education system for black children, the security police once again targeted journalists. They detained many of us for lengthy periods, claiming that black journalists had been encouraging black children to boycott classes.
Zwelakhe Sisulu was during that period of repression detained for nearly two years.
In Durban, Cape Town, Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth, East London and other centres - black journalists continued to work with the community in an attempt to establish alternative newspapers.
PRESS TRUST OF SOUTH AFRICA
In Durban, the Press Trust of South Africa Third World News Agency was established as one of the first moves to provide the outside world with accurate information about the situation in South Africa. The news agency was established to operate alongside the running of the alternative newspaper, Ukusa.
But just when the newspaper was set to start publishing with the blessing of the community, the state struck again and banned its Managing Editor - this correspondent; and also Zwelakhe Sisulu, Joe Thloloe, Philip Mthimkulu and Charles Nqakula in December 1980. This was a massive blow for the alternative media because all the journalists were fully involved in the various projects.
Some of the publications that they were involved in were UKUSA in Durban, Grassroots in Cape Town, Speak in Johannesburg and Umthonyana in Port Elizabeth. The South African Council of Churches also sponsored the publication of a newspaper called The Voice. Philip Mthimkulu and Juby Mayet worked for this newspaper before they were banned.
The journalists in question were put out of circulation for three years until the end of `1983 when their banning orders expired. But during their period of forced exile, the journalists did not remain idle - for instance the Press Trust of South Africa News Agency continued to operate under some trying conditions, intimidation and harrassment. All the banned journalists also kept in touch with one another and on one occasion two of us - Zwelakhe Sisulu and the writer - even met under secrecy in Johannesburg to discuss the establishment of alternative newspapers once our banning orders expired.
During this period Charles Nqakula skipped the country to join the ANC. Upon his return he served the new government in various positions, including Minister of Defence.
Between 1980 and 1983 - the Press Trust News Agency managed to supply news to the outside world about the struggles in South Africa. When our banning orders expired - most of us went straight back to our task of continuing to provide an alternative voice for the black majority. In Johannesburg - Zwelakhe Sisulu initiated the establishment of the New Nation newspaper with the assistance of the South African Catholic Bishops Conference; in Cape Town Rashid Seria initiated the establishment of the South Newspaper; and in other parts of the country many other progressive forces and journalists began to establish alternative publications. Student organisations and leaders also produced a variety of alternative publications.
In Durban we continued with the Press Trust News Agency and supplied on the spot and analytical reports to radio stations in the United States, Europe, New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and at one time we even supplied information to the Tass News Agency, which was based in Zimbabwe after that country's independence in 1980. Some of the radio stations we supplied reports to included the BBC, Radio Netherlands, Radio Deutsche Welle or Voice of Germany, Radio France Internationale and the Zimbabwean Broadcasting Corporation. In Durban some journalists also established the New African newspaper.
UNITED DEMOCRATIC FRONT
While we were determined to report the struggles for a free society - the apartheid regime was also determined to crush us.
It began another round of repression through P W Botha and in 1986 introduced some of the most repressive methods to suppress journalists. At this time the regime had introduced the tri-racial parliament for whites, coloured people and people of Indian origin; while the progressive forces established the United Democratic Front(UDF).
The UDF, together with the alternative media, the churches, trade unions and student organisations provided the regime with the biggest challenge - that the days of white minority rule are nearing an end.
Most of us - who were in the forefront of the alternative media - were under constant surveillance. For instance during the emergency regulations in 1986 and 1987 - every time there was a knock on our door - we lifted our heads to see if it was the Security Police. On one occasion more than 10 Security Policemen raided our office situated at that time in Protea House in West Street in Durban and confiscated a pile of documents.
On another occasion - our offices were mysteriously burgled and a computer, printer, computer discs, casettes, and even an automatic telephone were stolen. We reported the incident to the police and when one finger-print expert came to the office - we told him not to look too far for the thieves because the culprits would be either in the security police or national intelligence offices.
SECURITY POLICE HARRASSMENT
The period of sustained security police intimidation and harrassment we experienced was just an example of what the alternative media organisations and individuals encountered during that period.
All of us were also denied passports to travel overseas - the regime pontificated that we were "a danger to the security of the state" and, therefore, our movements had to be restricted. The New Nation and the Weekly Mail - two alternative newspapers in Johannesburg - were banned several times from 1986 to 1990.
The only time we were given respite was after the ANC, PAC, SACP and other organisations were unbanned early in 1990.
The sad demise of Zwelakhe Sisulu and struggle journalists, who contributed enormously to the dawn of our new our new South Africa, was yet another occasion for us to reflect on the contributions made by "struggle journalists".
STRUGGLE JOURNALISTS
And now on October 19 2015, 22 years into our new democratic South Africa we must ask ourselves whether we still face problems in the new democratic order. There's no doubt that certain moves currently by the ruling ANC to introduce some measures to control the media is a reminder that those we have put in power have now become a threat to the freedom of speech, freedom of information and the freedom of the Press that we fought and sacrficied for.
Personally I see no need for any law to protect any information - except for information that threatens the security of the state. But all other information are of interest and importance to the citizen. We need to know how state officials, politicians and others are ripping us off through bribery, corruption and state tenders.
NO ALTERNATIVE TO A FREE MEDIA
A country without a free media is not free at all and this must be communicated to the current people in political power.
Our first democratic president, Nelson Mandela, repeatedly told us how much he appreciated the work we had done for their freedom and how it was important that we continued to keep a check on the new politicians. He made it clear that the new politicians are answerable to the citizenry and not the other way round.
It seems our work is not finished. A La Continua - the struggle continues.
Thursday, October 15, 2015
TOP TAMIL LEADERS FROM SRI LANKA, INDIA AND THE DIASPORA INVITED TO ATTEND A CONFERENCE IN DURBAN ON THE FREEDOM OF TAMILS IN SRI LANKA
THE SUFFERING OF TAMILS CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE
By Subry Govender
High-level Tamil leaders from Sri Lanka, India, and the diaspora have been invited to attend a conference in Durban early next month to support processes towards a "peaceful, free, just and democratic" future for Tamils in Sri Lanka.
The conference, organised by the South African-based Solidarity Group for Peace and Justice (SGPJ) with the co-operation of the Government, follows the recent resolution adopted by the Un Human Rights Council in Geneva for a "special hybrid court" to be established in Sri Lanka to probe the violations of human rights. The court would include "Commonwealth and other foreign" judges, lawyers, prosecutors and investigators.
Since the end of the civil war in 2009, when it's reported that between 40 000 and 140 000 Tamils were massacred, the Sri Lankan Government and soldiers are alleged to have continued to violate the human rights of Tamils in the North and East of the island. These human rights violations include the continued detentions of activists, invasion of Tamil land by the military and other Sri Lankan elements, lack of freedom of political expression, lack of media freedom, sexual rapes and harrassment and the general de-humanisation of the inhabitants.
The SGPJ conference, which will be held on November 6 and 7 at the Coastlands Umhlanga in Durban, aims "to facilitate and encourage a discussion on the democratic future of Tamils in Sri Lanka".
The secretary of the SGPJ, Mr Pregs Padaychee, said in a statement that the conference would also be "an opportunity for Tamil political organisations within Sri Lanka and Tamil diaspora organisations to meet and find common ground in the interests of our Tamil brothers and sisters in Sri Lanka".
"The conference follows the highly successful meeting of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora organisations hosted by our South African Government and the Department of International Relations in London recently," said Mr Padaychee.
(TNA MP, M A Sumanthiran, invited to the conference)
Some of the top Tamil leaders invited include Mr M.A. Sumanthiran, who is an MP for the Tamil National Alliance(TNA) in the Sri Lankan Parliament; Mr V Gopalsamy, popularly known as Vaiko, who is a relentless supporter of the Tamil cause in Sri Lanka through his Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK), a political party active mainly in the state of Tamil Nadu; leaders of the AIDMK, which is led by Chief Minister Jayalalitha; and leaders of the DMK, which is led by veteran politician Mr Karunanidhi.
(Vaiko, a vocal leader for the rights of Tamils in Sri Lanka, also invited to attend the conference)
There will also be Tamil representatives from England, United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, and Singapore.
South African Deputy President, Mr Cyril Ramaphosa; other Government leaders; former Cabinet Minister, presidential spokesperson and ruling ANC stalwart, Mr Mac Maharaj; former UN Human Rights Commissioner, Justice Navi Pillay; former South African Constitutional Court judge and activist, Zac Yacoob; and Ms Yasmin Sooka of the Foundation for Human Rights, who has written extensively on the plight of Tamils in Sri Lanka, are some of the South Africans who will address the two-day conference.
( PLIGHT OF TAMILS IN THE NORTH AND EAST OF SRI LANKA)
The Durban conference is yet another gathering of Tamils from the diaspora and it's hoped that some positive developments will emerge at the end of the conference that will lead to freedom, justice and democracy for Tamils in Sri Lanka. There must be concrete changes in the lives of the people on the ground in the North and East of Sri Lanka. While the conference will be another opportunity for leaders to highlight the plight of Tamils in Sri Lanka, it should not be a venue for those wanting to promote their egos. The freedom and human rights of the Tamils in the North and East of Sri Lanka are far more important.
(MUCH-NEEDED UNITY )
It's also hoped that the Durban conference will lead to much-needed unity among the varied and disparate Tamil organisations around the world. - ends (Subry Govender/South Africa)
Thursday, September 17, 2015
OTTAWA RESIDENTS EMPHASISE THE RESIDENTIAL NATURE OF THEIR VILLAGE
(Some the residents at the meeting at the Ottawa Civic Hall on Thursday, Sept 10 2015)
(By Subry Govender )
The village of Ottawa, near Verulam, on the KwaZulu-Natal North Coast is primarily a residential area and no truckers, scrap yards and other illegal businesses should be allowed to operate in the village.
The was the clear and candid message conveyed to Ethekwini Municipality Town Planning officials at a meeting at the Ottawa Civic Hall on Thursday (Sept 10) evening.
The meeting was convened by the Town Planning Department to inform residents about the municipality's "Ottawa Functional Area Plan and Scheme Project".
After being informed of the proposals by the Planning officials, the residents spoke out against the general degeneration and degradation of Ottawa by some trucking companies and scrap yard dealers who are operating in various parts of the village.
They pointed out vociferously and clearly that Ottawa was primarily a residential area and future developmental plans should take this into account.
The residents emphasised that:
* Ottawa is a rich historical village and the residential nature of the area should not be tampered with.
* Trucking companies, scrap yard dealers and other illegal businesses are destroying the environment, including the Ohlanga River and its streams. A number of truckers are dumping sand into the river and one businessman had even set up a poultry business on the river near the Ottawa bridge. The municipality is doing nothing to take action and move the businesses to an industrial area.
*Any future developmental plan should ensure that the environment is protected and the municipality should take steps to stop the degeneration and degradation of the area.
Residents said after the meeting that it was coincidental that the meeting had been organised by the Town Planning officials at a time when Durban was hosting the 14th World Forestry Congress at the ICC.
The Congress delegates, who are from all parts of the world, want to protect forests in their countries to, among other things, counter climatic change and promote the future of humanity.
"We sincerely hope that as Durban and South Africa is concerned about preserving and protecting our forests, the environment and our heritage, that the Planning people in the city will spare a thought for the residents of Ottawa who have to put up with the degeneration and degradation of our village on a daily basis by unscrupulous business people and lack of action by the municipality. It is also the onus of residents to exercise their civic responsibility to prevent and conserve their residential and surrounding environments," said Ms Andisha Maharaj, Facilitator of the Ottawa Environmental Forum. ends - subry govender Sept 11 2015
OTTAWA RESIDENTS UP IN ARMS OVER DESTRUCTION OF ENVIRONMENT
"OTTAWA IS A RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE"
(Some of the residents who attended the meeting at the Ottawa Civic Hall on Thursday, Sept 10 2015)
By Subry Govender
The residents of Ottawa, near Verulam, on the North Coast have made urgent representations to the Ethekwini Municipality to help the community in protecting the area from degeneration and degradation.
The residents, led by the Ottawa Environmental Forum, have submiited a memorandum to the municipality about the degeneration of the area that has been allowed to take place over the past few years.
The residents have highlighted the destruction of the Ottawa River by unscrupulous truck owners who are dumping sand and rubbish into the river; the use of residential properties in Munn Road and Riverview Road for their prepesterous and illegal actions; the use of residential properties in Kissoon Road, Maharaj Road, Riverview Road and Munn Road for the parking of huge trucks; the dumping of sand, reclaiming of land and establishment of a livestock business near the Ottawa bridge; the use of an area at the entrance to School Road for anti-social activities; the alleged use of the Ottawa Community Hall by squatters; and the general litter and filth that has enveloped the main road and the other roads in the village.
A meeting was held with two municipal officials recently after the Ottawa Environment Forum submitted its complaints.
The municipal officials were appalled at the situation and promised to take appropriate actions and to work with the Forum to clean up the area.
Mr Atom Dilraj, an official of the Ottawa Environmental Forum, said the residents were deeply concerned about the general degeneration that has engulfed the village.
"We are particularly concerned at the uncontrolled filling of the river bank on both sides in the Ottawa section between R102 and the Ottawa Old Main Road.
"We cannot allow this historic village to be destroyed by the lack of concern for the environment. The municipality must take urgent steps to clean up the litter and filth by consulting with the residents," he said. ends - Subry Govender Sept 11 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)